Agent — Healthcare Project Manager
Knowledge Base for Copilot Studio — Version 1.0, April 2026
Project management frameworks adapted for the healthcare and social services sector. Synthesized from PMBOK 7th Edition, healthcare project management best practices, Lean Startup, Lencioni’s team dynamics, and Sinek’s purpose-driven approach.
1. PMBOK 7th Edition — Principles and Performance Domains
1.1 The 12 Project Management Principles
These principles guide behavior and decision-making throughout the project lifecycle. They are not prescriptive steps but foundational truths that apply across all project types.
| # | Principle | Healthcare Application |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Be a diligent, respectful, and caring steward | Manage project resources (budget, staff time, equipment) as shared organizational assets. In healthcare, staff time is the scarcest resource. |
| 2 | Create a collaborative project team environment | Bridge clinical-administrative silos. Include frontline staff, physicians, and support teams in project decisions. Use interdisciplinary committees. |
| 3 | Effectively engage with stakeholders | Healthcare projects involve many stakeholder groups (clinical teams, patients/families, unions, medical staff, accreditation bodies). Map and engage each group with the right strategy. |
| 4 | Focus on value | Every project deliverable must link to patient care improvement, operational efficiency, staff wellbeing, or organizational sustainability. Ask: « What value does this deliver to patients and staff? » |
| 5 | Recognize, evaluate, and respond to system interactions | Hospital projects ripple across units, shifts, and departments. A change in one unit affects patient flow, staffing, and supply chain in others. |
| 6 | Demonstrate leadership behaviors | The project lead in healthcare is often not the hierarchical authority. Influence-based leadership is critical. Demonstrate transparency and accountability. |
| 7 | Tailor based on context | A quality improvement project in a NICU requires a different approach than an IT system implementation. Tailor scope, governance, and reporting to the context. |
| 8 | Build quality into processes and deliverables | In healthcare, quality is not optional — it is tied to patient safety. Embed quality checks (audits, peer review, pilot testing) at every phase. |
| 9 | Navigate complexity | Healthcare is a complex adaptive system. Projects must account for emergent behaviors, conflicting priorities, and unpredictable clinical demands. |
| 10 | Optimize risk responses | Use structured risk registers. In healthcare, risk categories include clinical safety, regulatory compliance, staff resistance, technology adoption, and financial sustainability. |
| 11 | Embrace adaptability and resiliency | Healthcare projects face constant disruption (pandemics, staffing crises, new directives). Build flex into timelines and maintain a contingency plan. |
| 12 | Enable change to achieve the envisioned future state | Projects are vehicles for change. Pair project management with change management (see Agent 8) to ensure adoption and sustainability. |
1.2 The 8 Performance Domains
Performance domains are interactive areas of focus that work together throughout the project.
| Domain | Focus | Key Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Stakeholders | Identify, analyze, engage, and monitor stakeholder relationships | Stakeholder register, engagement plan |
| Team | Build a high-performing, collaborative project team | Team charter, RACI matrix |
| Development Approach & Life Cycle | Select the right delivery approach (predictive, adaptive, hybrid) | Approach selection rationale |
| Planning | Organize and elaborate scope, schedule, resources, risk | Project plan, WBS, schedule |
| Project Work | Manage day-to-day execution and knowledge | Progress reports, issue log |
| Delivery | Ensure deliverables meet requirements and enable outcomes | Acceptance criteria, quality audits |
| Measurement | Assess project performance and take corrective action | KPIs, dashboards, variance reports |
| Uncertainty | Address risks, ambiguity, and complexity | Risk register, contingency plans |
2. Project Charter — Structure and Best Practices
2.1 Recommended Charter Structure for Healthcare Projects
- Titre du projet — Clear, descriptive name
- Promoteur et mandataire — Executive sponsor and project lead
- Contexte et problématique — Why this project? What problem does it solve? Link to strategic plan, accreditation requirements, or operational needs.
- Objectifs SMART — Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound objectives
- Portée (inclusions et exclusions) — What is IN and OUT of scope. Critical in healthcare to avoid scope creep into adjacent clinical processes.
- Parties prenantes clés — Summary table of key stakeholders with roles
- Livrables principaux — Tangible outputs with acceptance criteria
- Échéancier préliminaire — High-level milestones with target dates
- Ressources et budget — Human resources (FTE allocation), financial envelope, material needs
- Risques majeurs identifiés — Top 3-5 risks with preliminary assessment
- Hypothèses et contraintes — Assumptions made and known constraints (regulatory, union, clinical calendar)
- Critères de succès — How will success be measured? Link to PMBOK Principle 4 (focus on value).
- Gouvernance — Reporting structure, decision-making authority, escalation path
- Approbations — Signature section for sponsor and key stakeholders
❌ « Améliorer le processus d’admission »
✅ « Réduire le délai moyen d’admission de 4,2 heures à 2,5 heures d’ici le 31 mars 2027, pour les admissions programmées en chirurgie pédiatrique, mesuré via le système d’information Cristal-Net. »
2.2 Common Charter Pitfalls in Healthcare
- Vague scope: « Améliorer la qualité des soins » is not a scope — it is a vision. Narrow it to a specific process, unit, and population.
- Missing stakeholders: Forgetting physicians (who operate outside the hierarchical structure), unions, or patient representatives.
- Unrealistic timelines: Not accounting for clinical calendar constraints (summer vacations, holiday coverage, accreditation visits).
- No governance: Projects without clear decision authority stall when the first disagreement arises.
- Scope creep disguised as improvement: « While we’re at it, let’s also fix X » — requires formal change control.
3. Stakeholder Analysis — Methods and Tools
3.1 Power-Interest Grid
The most commonly used stakeholder classification tool. Plot each stakeholder on two axes: Power (ability to influence the project) and Interest (level of concern about the project).
| Low Interest | High Interest | |
|---|---|---|
| High Power | Keep Satisfied Engage regularly, manage expectations. Ex: Direction générale, CA | Manage Closely Key players — involve in decisions. Ex: Promoteur, chef de programme, médecin responsable |
| Low Power | Monitor Minimal effort, watch for changes. Ex: Fournisseurs externes, autres directions | Keep Informed Regular communication, address concerns. Ex: Personnel de l’unité, syndicats, familles |
3.2 Stakeholder Register Template
| Partie prenante | Rôle | Intérêt | Pouvoir | Posture actuelle | Posture souhaitée | Stratégie d’engagement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex: Direction des soins infirmiers | Promoteur | Élevé | Élevé | Favorable | Champion | Impliquer dans les décisions clés, rapports mensuels |
| Ex: Syndicat FIQ local | Partie prenante | Élevé | Moyen | Neutre | Favorable | Informer proactivement, consulter sur impacts horaires |
| Ex: Équipe de l’unité | Utilisateurs finaux | Élevé | Faible | Inquiet | Engagé | Ateliers participatifs, communication régulière, feedback loops |
3.3 Engagement Strategy Levels (IAP2 Spectrum adapted)
| Level | Description | Healthcare Example |
|---|---|---|
| Inform | One-way communication. Provide balanced information. | Newsletter to other units about the project |
| Consult | Two-way communication. Gather feedback. | Survey to frontline staff about current pain points |
| Involve | Work directly with stakeholders. Their input shapes decisions. | Working group with nurses, PAB, and AIC to co-design the new process |
| Collaborate | Partner in decision-making. Shared ownership. | Joint committee with physicians and nursing to define clinical protocols |
| Empower | Final decision-making authority rests with the stakeholder. | Unit team decides on their own implementation schedule within parameters |
3.4 Typical Healthcare Stakeholder Categories
- Clinical: Physicians (attending, residents), nursing (infirmières, infirmières auxiliaires, PAB, AIC), allied health professionals (pharmacists, nutritionists, social workers, physiotherapists)
- Administrative: Direction (DSI, DSP, DRHCAJ, DSM, DRF), programme chiefs, unit managers, coordinators
- Support: IT, facilities, procurement, quality & risk management, communications
- External: MSSS, Agrément Canada, CISSS/CIUSSS partners, universities (teaching hospital context), patient committees (comité des usagers)
- Union: FIQ, APTS, CSN — always a stakeholder in projects that affect working conditions, schedules, or task descriptions
4. Risk Management — Register, Scoring, and Response
4.1 Risk Register Template
| ID | Risque | Catégorie | Probabilité (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score (P×I) | Stratégie de réponse | Actions de mitigation | Responsable | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | Résistance du personnel au nouveau processus | Humain | 4 | 4 | 16 | Atténuer | Ateliers participatifs, champions de changement, communication proactive | Chef de projet | Ouvert |
| R02 | Retard de livraison du système informatique | Technique | 3 | 5 | 15 | Atténuer | Clauses contractuelles, plan B avec processus papier temporaire | Coordonnateur TI | Ouvert |
| R03 | Départ d’un membre clé de l’équipe projet | Humain | 3 | 4 | 12 | Atténuer | Documentation des processus, transfert de connaissances, doublure identifiée | Promoteur | Surveillance |
4.2 Probability × Impact Scoring Matrix
| Impact 1 (Négligeable) | Impact 2 (Mineur) | Impact 3 (Modéré) | Impact 4 (Majeur) | Impact 5 (Critique) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prob. 5 (Quasi certain) | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
| Prob. 4 (Probable) | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
| Prob. 3 (Possible) | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 |
| Prob. 2 (Improbable) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| Prob. 1 (Rare) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Risk priority zones:
- Score 15-25 (Critical): Requires immediate action plan, escalation to sponsor, and active monitoring at every project meeting.
- Score 8-14 (Significant): Requires mitigation plan and regular monitoring.
- Score 1-7 (Low): Monitor and review periodically. Accept if cost of mitigation exceeds potential impact.
4.3 Risk Response Strategies
| Strategy | Description | Healthcare Example |
|---|---|---|
| Avoid (Éviter) | Eliminate the threat by changing the project plan | Change the implementation date to avoid the summer vacation period |
| Mitigate (Atténuer) | Reduce probability or impact | Provide training before go-live to reduce adoption resistance |
| Transfer (Transférer) | Shift ownership to a third party | Use vendor support agreement for technical risks |
| Accept (Accepter) | Acknowledge and prepare contingency | Accept that minor schedule slippage may occur during flu season; build buffer |
| Escalate (Escalader) | Push to a higher authority when outside project scope | Escalate budget shortfall to direction for strategic decision |
4.4 Healthcare-Specific Risk Categories
- Clinical safety: Risk of impacting patient care during transition (dual systems, new workflows, training gaps)
- Regulatory: Agrément Canada requirements, MSSS directives, professional practice standards (OIIQ, CMQ)
- Human resources: Staff turnover, resistance, training capacity, union grievances, overtime impacts
- Technical: IT system reliability, integration with existing systems, data migration
- Financial: Budget overruns, unexpected costs, dependency on external funding
- Organizational: Competing priorities, leadership changes, restructuring, pandemic response demands
5. Progress Reporting — Decision-Oriented Structure
5.1 Recommended Progress Report Structure
- En-tête: Project name, reporting period, prepared by, date, project status indicator (green/yellow/red)
- Sommaire exécutif (3-5 lignes): Overall status, key achievement this period, main issue or risk
- Tableau de bord synthèse:
Dimension Statut Commentaire Échéancier 🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴 Brief explanation Budget 🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴 Brief explanation Portée 🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴 Brief explanation Risques 🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴 Brief explanation Parties prenantes 🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴 Brief explanation - Réalisations de la période: What was accomplished (concrete deliverables, milestones reached)
- En cours: What is actively being worked on
- À venir (prochaine période): Planned activities and milestones
- Enjeux et obstacles: Issues requiring attention or escalation
- Décisions requises: Specific decisions the committee or sponsor must make, with options and recommendations
- Risques mis à jour: New risks identified, changes in risk scores, completed mitigation actions
5.2 Traffic Light Status Definitions
| Status | Definition | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Green (Vert) | On track. No significant issues. | Continue as planned. |
| 🟡 Yellow (Jaune) | At risk. Minor deviations or emerging issues that may escalate. | Corrective action in progress. Monitor closely. |
| 🔴 Red (Rouge) | Off track. Significant deviation from plan. Objectives at risk. | Escalation required. Decision or intervention needed. |
6. Communication Planning — Stakeholder-Driven Approach
6.1 Communication Plan Template
| Audience cible | Message clé | Canal | Fréquence | Responsable | Objectif |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comité de direction | Avancement stratégique, décisions requises | Rapport écrit + présentation | Mensuel | Chef de projet | Approbation et alignement |
| Équipe projet | Tâches, jalons, enjeux opérationnels | Réunion Teams | Hebdomadaire | Chef de projet | Coordination et suivi |
| Personnel de l’unité | Impacts concrets, calendrier, formation | Courriel + affichage + capsule vidéo | Aux jalons clés | Chef d’unité | Préparation et engagement |
| Syndicat | Impacts sur conditions de travail, horaires | Rencontre formelle | Au besoin (avant changements) | Chef de projet + RH | Information et consultation |
| Familles / usagers | Changements dans les services, améliorations attendues | Affichage + site web + comité des usagers | Aux étapes majeures | Communications | Transparence |
6.2 Communication Principles for Healthcare Projects
- Start with WHY (Sinek): Begin every communication with the purpose — why this project matters for patients, staff, and the organization. Clinical teams disengage when they see projects as administrative exercises.
- Repeat core messages: Healthcare staff work in shifts. A message sent once is a message never received. Repeat through multiple channels and at multiple times.
- Be transparent about uncertainty: Acknowledge what is not yet decided. Staff respect honesty more than false reassurance.
- Differentiate messages by audience: Physicians need clinical evidence and professional autonomy. Nurses need practical impact on their workflow. Managers need timeline, resources, and decisions. Executives need strategic alignment and risk.
- Listen more than you broadcast: Communication is two-way. Create feedback mechanisms (suggestion boxes, short surveys, open office hours, unit visits).
7. Lean and Iterative Approach in Healthcare Projects
7.1 Lean Startup Principles Applied to Healthcare
| Lean Startup Concept | Healthcare Translation | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Build-Measure-Learn | Test small, measure results, adjust before scaling | Pilot the new admission process in ONE unit for 4 weeks before deploying to the entire programme |
| Minimum Viable Product (MVP) | Minimum Viable Process — the simplest version that delivers value | Start with a paper-based triage checklist before investing in digital tools |
| Validated Learning | Use data to confirm the improvement works, not just opinions | Measure door-to-bed time before and after the pilot — if no improvement, redesign before scaling |
| Pivot or Persevere | If pilot data shows the approach is not working, change direction rather than pushing through | The new scheduling template causes more overtime — pivot to a different staffing model |
7.2 PDSA Cycles (IHI Model for Improvement)
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) recommends rapid PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles as the engine for improvement projects in healthcare.
- Plan: Define what you will test, who is involved, what data you will collect, and what you predict will happen.
- Do: Execute the test on a small scale. Document observations, problems, and deviations from the plan.
- Study: Analyze the data. Compare results to predictions. What did you learn?
- Act: Based on learning, decide: Adopt (scale), Adapt (modify and test again), or Abandon (try something else).
Plan: Test a new bedside medication reconciliation form on Unit 5B for 2 weeks. Prediction: will reduce medication discrepancies by 30%.
Do: 47 patients processed. Nurses report form takes 8 extra minutes per admission.
Study: Discrepancies reduced by 42% (exceeds prediction) but time added creates scheduling pressure on evening shift.
Act: Adapt — simplify 3 fields, add pharmacy technician support on evening shift. Test again for 2 weeks.
7.3 When to Use Iterative vs. Traditional Approaches
| Project Characteristic | Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Well-defined scope, clear requirements (ex: construction, equipment procurement) | Predictive (traditional) | Requirements are stable. Planning can be done upfront. |
| Uncertain outcomes, evolving requirements (ex: clinical process redesign, new service model) | Adaptive (iterative/agile) | Need to learn through experimentation. Requirements emerge. |
| Mix of both (ex: IT implementation with process redesign) | Hybrid | Technical delivery is predictive; process adoption is adaptive. |
8. Team Dynamics and Project Leadership
8.1 Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions — Applied to Healthcare Project Teams
Lencioni’s model describes five cascading dysfunctions that prevent teams from performing. Each must be resolved in order from the base up.
| # | Dysfunction | Healthcare Symptom | Project Manager Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Absence of Trust | Team members hide mistakes, avoid asking for help, protect their turf (clinical vs administrative silos) | Model vulnerability. Acknowledge your own uncertainties. Create safe space for honest discussion. |
| 2 | Fear of Conflict | Artificial harmony in meetings. Real disagreements happen in hallways. Physicians disengage silently. | Explicitly invite dissent: « What could go wrong with this plan? » Normalize constructive debate. |
| 3 | Lack of Commitment | Meeting ends with head nods but no follow-through. « I was never consulted. » | Summarize decisions and owners at end of every meeting. Confirm commitment explicitly. |
| 4 | Avoidance of Accountability | No one follows up on missed deadlines. « It’s not my project. » | Publish task owners and deadlines. Follow up in writing. Address non-delivery privately first, then in the group. |
| 5 | Inattention to Results | Focus on individual unit metrics rather than project outcomes. Status over results. | Define shared success metrics. Celebrate project-level wins, not just individual achievements. |
8.2 Inclusive and Epicene Writing — CHU Sainte-Justine Standard
Strategy 1 — Collective or Institutional Noun (HIGHEST PRIORITY)
Replace with a collective noun, an administrative unit name, or an encompassing term.
| Masculin générique | Remplacement (Stratégie 1) |
|---|---|
| les infirmiers | le personnel infirmier |
| les gestionnaires | l’équipe de gestion |
| les médecins | le corps médical |
| les employés | le personnel |
| les directeurs | la direction |
| les chercheurs | l’équipe de recherche |
Strategy 2 — Full Doublet, Feminine First
When no collective noun is available, use the full doublet with the feminine form first.
| Masculin générique | Remplacement (Stratégie 2) |
|---|---|
| le coordonnateur | la coordonnatrice ou le coordonnateur |
| le chef d’unité | la cheffe ou le chef d’unité |
| l’adjoint | l’adjointe ou l’adjoint |
| un professionnel | une professionnelle ou un professionnel |
Strategy 3 — « Personne + complement » (Targeted Use)
Use only when Strategies 1 and 2 produce awkward phrasing. DO NOT overuse.
| Context | Formulation |
|---|---|
| Generic reference to someone in a role | la personne responsable du projet |
| Unknown individual | la personne qui assurera la coordination |
Strategy 4 — Midpoint Abbreviation (LAST RESORT)
Use ONLY in tables, forms, or space-restricted contexts where Strategies 1-3 are impossible.
| Context | Abbreviated Form |
|---|---|
| Table header, short label | coordonnateur·rice |
| Form field | directeur·rice adjoint·e |
Additional rules:
- Some terms are already epicene and require no modification: gestionnaire, membre, spécialiste, responsable, titulaire, bénévole, stagiaire, analyste.
- NEVER use neopronouns (iel, ielle, celleux). Use full doublets instead.
- NEVER use parentheses for feminine forms: employé(e) is prohibited. Use full doublet: employée ou employé.
8.3 RACI Matrix for Healthcare Projects
The RACI matrix clarifies who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each project deliverable or decision.
| Livrable / Décision | Chef de projet | Promoteur | Équipe clinique | TI | Syndicat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charte de projet | R | A | C | C | I |
| Plan de communication | R | A | C | I | I |
| Spécifications techniques | C | I | C | R/A | I |
| Formation du personnel | A | I | R | C | I |
| Décision de go-live | R | A | C | C | I |
9. Project Closure and Lessons Learned
9.1 Closure Plan Structure
- Rappel des objectifs: What was the project supposed to achieve? (Refer back to the charter.)
- Résultats obtenus: What was actually achieved? Compare objectives vs. results with data.
- Livrables produits: List of all deliverables with acceptance status.
- Écarts et justifications: Where did the project deviate from plan (scope, timeline, budget)? Explain why.
- Leçons apprises: Structured using the template below.
- Transfert et pérennisation: Who is now responsible for maintaining the change? What mechanisms are in place to prevent regression?
- Remerciements: Acknowledge contributions of team members and stakeholders.
- Recommandations: Actions or decisions remaining for the organization beyond this project.
9.2 Lessons Learned Template
| Catégorie | Ce qui a bien fonctionné | Ce qui pourrait être amélioré | Recommandation pour les projets futurs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gouvernance | |||
| Gestion des parties prenantes | |||
| Communication | |||
| Gestion des risques | |||
| Ressources et budget | |||
| Adoption et changement | |||
| Aspects techniques |
9.3 Sustainability Checklist
- ☐ New process is documented in the unit’s procedure manual
- ☐ Training materials are available for new staff onboarding
- ☐ A process owner is identified and has accepted responsibility
- ☐ Performance indicators are integrated into the unit’s regular dashboard
- ☐ A follow-up audit is scheduled (30, 60, 90 days post-deployment)
- ☐ Feedback mechanism is in place for ongoing improvement
- ☐ Knowledge transfer to the operational team is complete
10. Healthcare Context — Vocabulary, Standards, and Constraints
10.1 Québec Healthcare Sector Vocabulary
| Acronym / Term (FR) | English Equivalent / Explanation |
|---|---|
| CHU | Centre hospitalier universitaire — University Hospital Center |
| DSI | Direction des soins infirmiers — Nursing Directorate |
| DSP | Direction des services professionnels — Professional Services Directorate |
| DRHCAJ | Direction des ressources humaines, des communications et des affaires juridiques |
| MSSS | Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux — Ministry of Health |
| CISSS / CIUSSS | Centre intégré (universitaire) de santé et de services sociaux — Regional health authority |
| RSSS | Réseau de la santé et des services sociaux — Health and Social Services Network |
| FIQ | Fédération interprofessionnelle de la santé du Québec — Nurses’ union |
| APTS | Alliance du personnel professionnel et technique — Professional/technical staff union |
| CSN | Confédération des syndicats nationaux — National union confederation |
| OIIQ | Ordre des infirmières et infirmiers du Québec — Nursing professional order |
| CMQ | Collège des médecins du Québec — Medical professional order |
| AIC | Assistante infirmière-chef — Assistant head nurse |
| PAB | Préposé aux bénéficiaires — Patient attendant / orderly |
| TSO | Temps supplémentaire obligatoire — Mandatory overtime |
| DMS | Durée moyenne de séjour — Average length of stay |
| POR | Plan d’organisation et de réorganisation — Organizational plan |
| PDGA | Président-directeur général adjoint — Associate CEO |
10.2 Key Regulatory and Quality Frameworks
- Agrément Canada (Qmentum): National accreditation standards. Projects must align with Required Organizational Practices (ROPs) and accreditation cycles.
- MSSS — Plan stratégique: Provincial strategic orientations that guide institutional priorities.
- OIIQ — Standards of practice: Professional nursing standards that may constrain process redesign.
- Loi 25 (Protection des renseignements personnels): Privacy legislation. Projects involving personal data must comply.
- IHI Triple Aim: Framework for optimizing health system performance (better care, better health, lower cost). Projects should contribute to at least one dimension.
10.3 Healthcare Project Constraints to Always Consider
- Clinical calendar: Summer (June-September) = skeleton staff due to vacations. Holiday coverage periods (December-January). Academic calendar for teaching hospital (new residents in July).
- Union environment: Changes affecting working conditions, schedules, or task descriptions may require union notification or consultation. Grievance risk is real.
- Physician governance: Physicians are not employees — they are members of the medical staff (CMDP). Their participation is voluntary and influence-based, not directive.
- 24/7 operations: Hospitals never close. Implementation must account for all shifts (day, evening, night, weekends). Training and communication must reach everyone.
- Patient safety first: Any project that temporarily degrades care quality during transition requires a risk mitigation plan approved by clinical leadership.
- Multi-site complexity: Some projects span multiple sites within a CISSS/CIUSSS or involve external partners.
10.4 Document Formatting Standards
| Element | Standard |
|---|---|
| Font | Arial |
| Primary color (headers, emphasis) | #002F84 (Blue) |
| Accent color (highlights, callouts) | #E6007E (Magenta/Pink) |
| Secondary color (tables, borders) | #00ABA0 (Teal) |
10.5 Typical Hierarchical Levels and Language Adaptation
| Level | Example Titles | Language Adaptation for Project Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Operational | Chef d’unité, coordonnatrice ou coordonnateur, AIC | Concrete, action-oriented, practical timelines, impact on daily work |
| Tactical | Cheffe ou chef de programme, directrice ou directeur adjoint | Data/analysis balance, results, options, resource implications |
| Strategic | Directrice ou directeur, PDG, PDGA | Synthetic, strategic alignment, risk focus, decision-oriented |
| Governance | CA, comité de vigilance, comité exécutif | Very synthetic, compliance, accountability, value delivered |
End of Knowledge Base — Agent, Healthcare Project Manager — v1.0